Wednesday, November 30, 2011

Modern Morals of the average Ron Paul hater

There once was a time when we learned that it was not right to go around punching and hitting people, especially if the only reason was name calling and chiding.  Many parents teach their kids to defend themselves but only when someone hits them first.    
 
Sticks and stones may break my bones but names will never hurt me.

Today it's being re-written.

Sticks and Stones may break me bones, but provocative words are worse.

The new moral of the story, attack anyone who uses words you don't agree with. Especially if they threaten someone else. You need not wait for them to attack you directly.

Can you imagine?

Mother - Billy, why did you punch Bobby in the nose? 


Son - Mom, Bobby was going to hit Kyle first.

Mother - Bobby was going to hit Kyle, but he didn't actually hit Kyle?


Son - Yup. That's what I learned from watching Fox News. It's ok to attack someone if they were going to attack your friend first.

Mother - Oh, that makes perfect sense....

Really???


Is this the new lesson we are going to teach our children?  

Stumble Upon Toolbar

Tuesday, November 29, 2011

Herman Cain Mailer

Stumble Upon Toolbar

Friday, November 25, 2011

Police State

What happens when the state sees you as a threat?  They will use all means of force against you.  Resistance will not be tolerated.  The following is an excerpt from a recent SWAT versus citizen situation. 

"Within moments, and without Guerena firing a shot--or even switching his rifle off of"safety"--he lay dying, his body riddled with 60 bullets. A subsequent investigation revealed that the initial shot that prompted theS.W.A.T. team barrage came from a S.W.A.T. team gun, not Guerena's. Guerena,reports later revealed, had no criminal record, and no narcotics were found at his home."

This is what it means to live in a police state.  When a citizen who has served his country is killed due to suspicion and the police who charged with serving us, instead, become jury and executioners.  This man did nothing wrong.  He attempted to secure his property from an unknown attack and was killed by a superior force not made up of gang bangers or criminals but officers granted with a license to kill.  I'm sure that law enforcement will say that this was a accident and point to the fact that this hardly ever happens, but is that true?  In a land governed by the law of our Constitution, why don't they treat every home like it may be armed from within?  When did it become common place for the police to shoot first and ask questions later?

"The extent of this weapon "inflation" does not stop with high-powered rifles, either. In recent years, police departments both large and small have acquired bazookas, machine guns, and even armored vehicles (mini-tanks) for use in domestic police work."

Why is it now common place for the police to have such weapons but citizens need to jump thru hoops just to enjoy their constitutionally protected right to bare arms?  In my home state of Illinois, they require a special I.D known as FOID, (Firearms Owners ID) just to purchase and own firearms.  Many states require special permits and training for concealed carry.  Does this make any sense? 

The 2nd Amendment is not about hunting.  Do you really think the take over is going to look like this? 




Of Course not right? 






Totally Different!!!  They're wearing black....  

Cheers,

Mike
 

Stumble Upon Toolbar

Thursday, November 17, 2011

Do we need to support Israel?


We need to support Israel because this is the prophesy the Bible speaks about.  I don't understand this argument. 
 
Most would agree that the bible is clear on defense, and the possession of weapons to defend, but did the United States fulfill a Biblical prophesy in 1948 by creating a nation destined for war? I think that's a self fulfilling prophesy if I've ever seen one. The  Palestinian people people were there in the desert over a hundred years prior to us having ripped their land away so we could create a Jewish state in the middle of an Islamic desert. Then we armed those Jews for war, and we criticize others for arming the Muslims. Does this make any sense, to anyone? Now, today, people are looking at this whole situation like it's some kind of biblical prophesy. HELLO!!! SNL, couldn't make this shit up. Throwing together mortal enemies, adding weapons, and then standing back to see what happens.... OMG!!!, they're fighting, I CAN'T BELIEVE IT!!!! This must be what the bible talked about.....

Further more, the U.S.A is a nation of individuals. Belief in God is not prerequisite in order to be a citizen. 

(Thanks to Obama's bone headed comment you're going to hate my next words)
 
We are not a Christian Nation. 
 
Many people are christian and I have no problem with that. If those people wish to pickup their sword and flock to Israels defense, I have no problem with that. What I have a problem with, is when people believe that we as a nation have an obligation to commit lives to a war that has nothing to do with our own sovereignty.

I understand many people have a deep passion for Israel, but that passion has nothing to do with our rights and freedoms as American Citizens. Keep in mind there is still no war to speak of. Yes, there are threats and there will always be threats but when we look for a leader, a President for the United States of America, we need to look for a person who has Our (the Nation known as the United States of America) best interests in mind. We are looking to elect the POTUS, not the Christian Crusader of the world. That person has an obligation to ensure the existence of our land and our freedom not that of Israel. I believe that task currently belongs to Benjamin Netanyahu.

Let's just say for a moment that we vote for a candidate who promises to use all of our resources to defend Israel, up to a full scale nuclear war. Is that what's in our best interests?


The American People elected Woodrow Wilson because he promised to keep us out of war. We now know that was never his intention as he fully expected to get into the war and he did just that as soon as he was elected. Now, we have people turning away from a candidate who is promising to keep us out of war, and instead looking to support candidates who are almost promising to get us into a war. These are strange times indeed.
 
Cheers,
Mike

Stumble Upon Toolbar

Tuesday, November 8, 2011

What's going on?

I took a little break from posting so I could reset my mind and consider all that is happening so fast.  

First some good news, Ron Paul won the Illinois Republican Straw Poll.  But as soon as he won, some started to speculate and dissect the poll results to show how his win doesn't really mean anything.  That figures, if Ron Paul does win the nomination and becomes President some people will still be coming up with stories about how he really didn't win, Ron Paul supporters only found a better way to cheat.    


Herman Cains past of sexual harassment doesn't seem to bother the hard core right, in fact the usual suspects are in full over drive defending him.  Its gotten so bad in fact that I'm hoping Cain did do something awful just so I can laugh at all those who are defending him without even knowing what he did or did not do.

Another thing that I noticed while on my short break was this story about forced sterilization in Carolina.  When we were criticizing Obama's Czar for writing a paper on how to carry out this kind of plan we were called crazy conspiracy theorists, but low and behold we find out its already been tried and tested.  That's weird.  But the Federal Government would never do that, would they?
 
How exactly is it that that so many people criticized the TEA party for being hateful and violent?  I've been reading all these stories about these Occupy Wall street nut jobs and I'm forced to shake my head.  At latest count, the Occupy protests have had 7 rapes and 3 deaths and countless reports of attacks and fights.  In Oregon, Occupy Protesters threw urine and feces at food vendors who wouldn't give them free food.  Mind you, that these vendors had given the protesters free food and drink early on but had stopped the practice when it got out of hand.  Was there anything like this at any TEA party events?


Perhaps it is time to seriously think about moving up onto a mountain somewhere. 

Cheers,

Mike

Stumble Upon Toolbar